Brits Get Their Own Gestapo Via NY Transfer News * All the News That Doesn't Fit INTERNMENT WITHOUT TRIAL: BRITS GET THEIR OWN HOMELAND GESTAPO 'TERROR' SUSPECTS TO BE TREATED LIKE THE IRISH The Independent - Nov 11, 2001 Terror suspects to be interned By Colin Brown and Jo Dillon The Home Secretary David Blunkett will this week declare a state of "public emergency" in Britain to introduce internment without trial for suspected terrorists in this country. The Home Secretary will provoke a storm of protest from senior Labour MPs, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats by announcing that Britain is derogating article five from the European Court of Human Rights to allow the detentions to take place. To do so, he will have to declare that Britain is under a heightened state of the threat of terrorism. However, MI5 has secretly warned MPs that the tough new anti-terrorist measures to be unveiled by Mr Blunkett on Tuesday do not go far enough. Officers from MI5 met the Home Affairs Select Committee and told MPs they needed a new law concerning conspiracy to commit a terrorist offence, so as to plug loopholes that allow suspected terrorists to go free. Their demands for tougher measures will set alarm bells ringing at Westminster, where MPs are preparing to attack some of the anti-terrorism proposals for going too far. The Home Affairs Select Committee, which is rushing out a report on the new terrorism Bill, is expected to register its concern. Its Labour chairman, Chris Mullin, has told friends he has misgivings about indefinite detention without trial. The Tory shadow Home Secretary, Oliver Letwin, will warn it is not in the national interest to detain suspected terrorists in British prisons. A Tory spokesman said: "We don't think interning terrorist suspects in this country is a very good idea. If we end up with prisons full of suspected terrorists we are making ourselves a prime target. There would be a risk, either from direct attempts being made to free terrorists from these prisons, or attempts to take British subjects hostage and try to trade them." Both the Liberal Democrats and the Tories are concerned at the speed at which the Bill is expected to go through Parliament and are calling for the legislation to be time-limited so that it would have to be renewed every year. The Liberal Democrats are worried that some of the provisions may exclude some people from the asylum process altogether. The Tories are unconvinced of the need to make incitement to religious hatred a crime. The committee meeting with MI5 officers was so secret that one member who missed it did not know it had happened. MI5 officers gave two examples of suspected terrorists who had been stopped but not arrested as they had not broken the law. One man had £180,000 in cash at an airport, stuffed into his children's clothes. Another was carrying arsenic. "They said the man with the arsenic might have been planning to poison the water supply but had committed no offence so he was allowed to go," said one committee member. The Home Office confirmed there was no law that could have led to detention in either case, although the Proceeds of Crime Bill allows the seizure of large sums involving crime. The sale of arsenic is tightly controlled but its possession is not an offence. * The Independent - 11 November 2001 http://www.independent.co.uk New police powers Muslim leaders warn of riots over anti-terror law By Severin Carrell Muslim leaders have warned David Blunkett that his crackdown on terrorism and religious hatred could spark off fresh race riots. Members of the Muslim community in Britain fear police will target them unfairly. In a 100-page submission to the Home Secretary, leaked to the Independent on Sunday, nine of Britain's most senior Muslim leaders warned they have "grave reservations" about his proposed powers for the police and courts. The Muslim leaders fear plans to give police and Customs officers the right to demand that Muslim women remove their hijab face and head coverings may provoke serious disturbances, as they breach a significant article of faith for some Muslims. They compared these powers to the abuse of "stop and search" by police in the 1980s, which sparked off riots in Brixton and Toxteth, Liverpool. "We object in the strongest terms to the introduction of these powers," they said. Racial tensions, which have been exacerbated by high levels of poverty and unemployment in Pakistani and Bangladeshi areas, are still running high in the northern towns such as Bradford, Oldham and Burnley, hit by rioting earlier this year. In Bradford last week, an Anglican vicar was stoned by masked Asian youths after he stopped them setting fire to his church. Muslim leaders will speak at the church's Remembrance Day service this morning in a bid to distance the city's Pakistani community from the attacks. The criticisms from Britain's most influential Muslim organisations are a severe blow to Tony Blair's attempts to build a cross-community consensus on the US-UK attacks on Afghanistan. Earlier this month, three Muslim Labour peers and a Muslim Labour MP urged Mr Blair to suspend the bombing to allow aid to reach refugees. Two of the nine signatories are bodies which hosted the Prime Minister's bridge-building speech to Muslims last month - the Al-Khoei Foundation and the Forum Against Islamophobia & Racism. The document has also been signed by: Dr Zaki Badawi of the Muslim College, Yousuf Bhailok of the Muslim Council of Britain, Dr Ghayasuddin Siddiqui of the Muslim Parliament, Yusuf Islam of the Association of Muslim Schools, the Union of Muslim Organisations, the Centre for Muslim Policy Research and the Muslim Women's Helpline. Mr Blunkett, who will unveil his new anti-terror Bill on Tuesday, was given the document two days ago. A shortened version was also given to the Home Affairs Select Committee. Mr Blunkett's officials insist powers to order the removal of headwear would be used only in specific investigations into terrorist activity, not during general policing. "It's very important that people recognise if there's a specific threat, we need to react to it," said one source. "Muslims were killed at the World Trade Centre as well." The Muslim leaders said their criticisms sprang from a "substantial risk" that these powers will be used mainly against ordinary Muslims because of the activities of a small number of Islamic fundamentalists and terror cells. They warn Mr Blunkett their support for measures to outlaw religiously motivated crime and religious hatred will be conditional on ministers introducing "careful supervision" and controls of the police, Crown Prosecution Service and courts to ensure these powers are fairly and equally enforced. They also accuse the Government of not going far enough to stop anti-religious discrimination in housing, the health system and public services. New regulations on religious discrimination in employment are expected to be very restricted, despite evidence of discrimination. "The increase in anti-Muslim prejudice in the post-11 September period has created a substantial risk that discrimination will taint the exercise of any additional criminal powers that specifically target a religious group," they argue. Khalid Mahmood, the Muslim MP for Birmingham Perry Bar, downplayed these fears. On the claims about head coverings, he said the police had the right to check people's identities but would use their powers sensitively. Outlawing religious hatred was needed to stamp out blatant attempts by the British National Party to promote Islamophobia. Muslims were the only mainstream religious group not to be legally protected, he added. "This is something we've fought for since the late 1980s," he said. * A march in Blackburn by supporters of the Taliban passed off peacefully yesterday. Only about 35 people supported the Al Muhajiroun rally, which took place in the constituency of Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary. ================================================================= NY Transfer News Collective * A Service of Blythe Systems Since 1985 - Information for the Rest of Us 339 Lafayette St., New York, NY 10012 http://www.blythe.org e-mail: nyt@blythe.org ================================================================= nytire-11.11.01-05:29:15-13337