Latin Amer Govts May OK G.M. Foods Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn't Fit OK to Gene Tinkering, Despite Potential Misuse By Silvio Hernandez PANAMA CITY, Jun 8 (IPS) - Latin American experts meeting here defended the use of genetically engineered seeds as a means of boosting crop yields, despite potential ethical and health problems arising from the misuse of genetic technology. Oscar Grau of Argentina, Gustavo de la Riva of Cuba, and Julio Yau from Panama, all experts in genetics, fielded questions about genetically-modified seeds at the seventh International Symposium organised by the Latin American Network of Biological Sciences last week in the Panamanian capital. Grau acknowledged that the major profits and significant market generated by genetically altered plants and seeds, along with ''the brisk business enjoyed by scandal sheets publishing articles about this technology,'' had triggered increased public concern. He also admitted that when plant genetics research began, experts had no idea what they were doing. ''It was like taking shots at the plant's DNA, hitting it in three or 50 different places and choosing one that looked good,'' said Grau. ''We had no idea of what we would be able to do with the plant, or even that the transformation of genes could be harmful.'' However, he said that researchers now knew what they were doing with genetic engineering. ''We know which genes we are introducing into the plant and how many, we know what information is encoded in the gene, in what part of the plant it is located, and what the gene produces. ''It's true that this may create problems,'' but in the balance of what was done before and what geneticists are doing now, ''we know that we are working carefully and that we're not doing things without knowing what is going on,'' he added. Grau stated, nevertheless, that ''the key point'' was not whether the technology should be used, but ''the ethical questions that society is going to have to define'' about its use. ''The (genetic) changes they are making may be good or bad, they may be used for purposes of war or for control, and that's where it becomes important that decisions are made by a society that doesn't want these things to be used in harmful ways.'' He also said he agreed with the use of gene therapy for treating a person suffering from a genetic disease. But when it comes to ''creating a person who is more blonde, who is taller, has a specific eye color and is more intelligent, society will have to make decisions about what may and may not be done,'' Grau remarked. Consumers, ecologists, and the International Union of Food Workers (IUF) questioned the marketing of genetically engineered plants and seeds and their potential impact on human and environmental health during a conference held in Montevideo, Uruguay last October. At that meeting, Sebastian Pinheiro, a Brazilian health and environmental advisor to the IUF, pointed out that the effects of genetically altered plants on the evolutionary process were still unknown. ''When genetically manipulated bacteria or pollen escape, there is no way of bringing them back, the environment will never be the same,'' argued Pinheiro. ''It's not like petroleum, which you can see. You can't see this - and its effects are completely out of our control.'' De la Riva agreed with such arguments at this week's conference, saying that genetically engineered seeds that are capable of spreading pollen to native plants must be controlled, and that ''we must ensure that these seeds have been approved and certified in their countries of origin.'' However, De la Riva also said that all sectors involved ''must take their work seriously without falling for the claims made by people in the European green parties.'' They can say what they want, he said, because ''in Europe people aren't going hungry, but we have to work hard to feed ourselves. ''We have food supply problems that are so serious that we don't have the luxury of responding to those claims,'' he maintained, adding that the interests of transnational corporations were one thing, while the need of poor countries to increase food production was another. Panamanian scientist Yau also recognised the concerns about this new technology's consequences, but said ''it has been very important in developing...seed and plant varieties with excellent disease and pest tolerance.'' Carolina Turin, a Honduran researcher for the non-governmental Zamorano Institute, pointed out that the problems of marketing and use of genetically-modified seeds and plants were much more serious in countries like her own, which lacked systems to monitor and regulate imports of such products. ''We don't have any way of determining if genetically engineered seeds are entering the country, and much less of regulating them,'' said Turin. (END/IPS/tra-so/sh/ag/ld/99) (c) 1999 IPS ================================================================= NY Transfer News Collective * A Service of Blythe Systems Since 1985 - Information for the Rest of Us 339 Lafayette St., New York, NY 10012 http://www.blythe.org e-mail: nyt@blythe.org ================================================================= nytcamer-06.11.99-02:24:45-22156